header image
 

Year 13 Coursework Essay draft

To what extent have gender roles progressed in mainstream Hollywood movies with reference to Angelina Jolie being cast for a role that was originally written for Tom Cruise?

In the 2010 movie SALT, Angelina Jolie plays the role of a CIA agent accused of being a Russian spy. Her name is Evelyn Salt and she goes on the run, however she is concerned about her husband’s safety and does everything possible to save him. What interested me in this film is the idea that the role of the woman has reversed and Angelina’s character has been created including many masculine traits. However, this argument can be looked from a different prospective as the character of Jolie does not manage to save her husband as he is made ‘tough enough’ to save himself. Furthermore, her appearance is attractive which can build up on Laura Mulvey’s theory of the ‘Male Gaze’ and the different aspects that are featured within the theory. T want to explore the question of has Hollywood progressed in portraying woman in a more independent and masculine way or actually there is no progress as they are still seen as sexual objects of the man’s desire.

‘The filmmakers believe that it was perfectly OK for the spouse to be rescued from mortal danger if said love interest was a girl, but not if the romantic partner was a man.’- Alison Thurston

Some can argue that the ‘damsel in distress’ is a male figure and by creating this image there is so called ‘progress’ in Hollywood production movies such as SALT. Never before has a female figure taken the role of such a masculine character. Angelina Jolie is known for her passion for masculine and ‘tough’ roles as she claimed in a magazine that she would rather ‘Play James Bond instead of the typically pretty and vulnerable Bond girl’. If Hollywood as made such a progression, than the audience and critics should ask themselves ‘Why is it so outrageous to put a man in a female role?’ If a movie is made with such a role, the audience would challenge the character’s sexuality immediately as a stereotype and an expectation is created within Hollywood movies and society about the image of the man. As the man needs to be seen as ‘powerful’, ‘dominant’ , ‘aggressive’ and ‘attractive to females’. I would count a progression with the idea of breaking those stereotypes and expectations from the male image. Women have been portrayed as ‘tough’ before in movies such as ‘The Tomb Rider’, however, their image has been highly sexualised to please the voyeurism of the man’s eye. This links to Laura Mulvey’s theory.

Laura Mulvey is a feminist which argued for the idea of the ‘Male Gaze’. Women in the media are portrayed in a way that can satisfy a man’s fantasy and expectation of a perfect woman. Angelina Jolie believed to be one of the most attractive women in Hollywood. To put her in the role of a man doesn’t convince all people that progress is made.

‘female characters, according to Mulvey, coded with “to-be-looked-at-ness.” Mulvey suggests that there were two distinct modes of the male gaze of this era: “voyeuristic” (i.e. seeing women as ‘whores’) and “fetishistic” (i.e. seeing women as ‘madonnas’).’

Fetishism in the movie SALT could be implied with the ultimate man’s fantasy of the ‘sexy girl with guns’. Even though Angelina plays a man’s role, she is sexualised by her appearance and there is still a creation of the fetishist view of her. However, some women, audience and critics might argue against this point by actually identifying with Jolie’s character of the independent, tough woman that is able to save herself from such danger and be so successful. Another point of view is that ‘do women really want to be represented in more masculine roles?’ or they want to ‘wait for the prince on the white horse’?

Furthermore, Angelina’s character is fairly unrealistic. She is a skinny woman, playing a CIA agent, suspected of being a Russian spy and fights equally with all the men in the movie who are triple her size. Is this progress? Not in my opinion. For a progression to happen in Hollywood production movies characters need to be portrayed in a more realistic way. Even if it said that this movie has a high feminist perspective it is not a realistic one. This is very unlikely to happen in the real world, so the audience might not even take ‘in’ the feminist hint that SALT is trying to push forward.

Evelyn Salt was trying to save her husband throughout the whole movie but at the end he was made strong and smart enough to save himself. SO the roles have not reversed completely. There is still the formula the formula of typical characters in movies: ‘the hero, the princess, victim, and villain. Even if some of them might be challenged as having the hero being a woman. But it will never be extreme enough to break this stereotype of the woman being less than the man. Many years need to go by for this image to be challenged even further, one unrealistic movie does not apply to all other Hollywood media productions.

Another theory that can be applied to this movie is the theory of the ‘dumb blonde’. The image of the attractive woman being vulnerable and highly unintelligent was created because of the ultimate man’s ego. It cannot be accepted that a woman can be beautiful, strong, independent, tough, could look after herself and intelligent because this would challenge the male dominance and authority. Yes Angelina’s character is beautiful. Yes it is independent, strong, and intelligent, however it is not complete. She is not able to save her husband and completely challenge this idea as he is still the dominant one by saving himself.

In conclusion, I disagree with the idea that Hollywood has made progress by portraying Angelina Jolie in such a way. This is because her character is unrealistic, fictional and not complete. She might have been cast for a male role however; the script was slightly changed to make it less shocking and obvious. A progress would have been if she managed to save her husband at the end and fully take on the masculine role of Tom Cruise’s original character. Furthermore, Hollywood should have picked a less attractive woman to play this role so the character of Evelyn Salt is not sexualised as Angelina Jolie is a sex icon. On the other hand, it is true that there are some successful aspects of feminist touch to this movie and there is slight progress by actually casting a female for a man’s action hero role.

Category:  Uncategorized     

Research into the movie SALT

Story line found from www.imdb.com

Evelyn Salt is a CIA agent and highly respected by all, including her boss, Ted Winter. Out of the blue, a Russian spy walks into their offices and offers a vital piece of information: the President of Russia will be assassinated during his forthcoming visit to New York City to attend the funeral of the recently deceased U.S. Vice President. The name of the assassin: Evelyn Salt. Concerned about the safety of her husband, who she cannot contact, she goes on the run. Winter refuses to accept that she is a mole or a double agent but her actions begin to raise doubts. Just who is Evelyn Salt and what is she planning? Written by garykmcd

Salt-Poster-Angelina-Jolie-403x600

http://www.movie-thoughts.com/2010/07/23/review-salt/ <– This review by Clifford Bugle mentions the feminist point of view of this film and the use of the Male Gaze. This is the part of the review that i found very interesting and useful for my investigation :)

On a completely different note, one interesting thing to do while watching this movie is keep track of the various ways of looking at it from a feminist perspective. On the one hand the character of Salt establishes herself as an autonomous woman who can best any adversary on either side of the fence (all of whom are men) with both her physical prowess and intellect, and due to her often appearing bruised and battered she could possibly (emphasis on possibly) be assuaging the dreaded male gaze. On the other hand, to quote one of feminism’s most popular figures, Simone de Beauvoir, “To emancipate woman is to refuse to confine her to the relations she bears to man” (The Second Sex) Salt is portrayed very similarly to male leads in action films who must avoid the authorities while fighting for good (as touched upon previously with a superficial comparison to the Bourne series). If Salt was meant to come off as a sort of feminist hero, does such an obvious similarity undercut that intent? To continue referencing Beauvoir from her seminal book The Second Sex, she continually suggests that women ought to see themselves as autonomous beings – separate from patriarchal society and its rule over female roles and identities. Could Salt, as a clearly autonomous character, not be considered an activist for this viewpoint? These and other related questions can be asked at many intervals throughout the film, and like the flip-flopping of allegiances it appears we can continue debating how it either supports or dishonors feminist thought.

Here are some extracts and quotes that I found on the internet about the movie SALT and I thought they were particularly interesting for my research.

  • Angelina Jolie ended up playing an action hero originally written for a male star like Tom Cruise (who bailed when the script began to too closely resemble a “Mission: Impossible” picture).”
  • “Now let’s cast men in roles written for women. Or at least think about why the idea of that sounds so preposterous.”
  • “In the original script, there was a huge sequence where Edwin Salt (the original male protagonist) saves his wife, who’s in danger,” says Noyce. “And what we found in the new script, it seemed to castrate his character a little. So we had to change the nature of that relationship.” In the end, Salt’s husband, played by German actor August Diehl (‘Inglourious Basterds’), was made tough enough that he didn’t need saving, thank you much.
  • So, hidden in an article on how “Salt” is oh-so-empowering for female action heroes is this tidbit. The filmmakers believe that it was perfectly OK for the spouse to be rescued from mortal danger if said love interest was a girl, but not if the romantic partner was a man. Apparently, it’s great if the action hero is a girl, as long as she doesn’t have the opportunity to one-up any male counterparts or reverse the oldest cliché in the action-film handbook. Saying that girls can be portrayed as helpless damsels in distress but boys can’t or shouldn’t be is the very opposite of the sort of “progress” that Noyce and Jolie claim to be making”
  • “I also feel as if the filmmakers are really trying to appeal to feminists, with a strong female lead being aggressive and largely independent. My question is—is this the kind of equality of representation we want?”
  • “I know the storyline lacked depth, and was not particularly challenging—a thin, conventionally attractive white woman engaging in brutal, splashy acts of violence.”
  • “In the film, Evelyn Salt (Jolie’s character) has skills to match those of the men around her, and is at times a complex character.”
  • But it’s certainly some sort of step to have a woman in a film being independent and not getting ahead by using her sex appeal or being derailed by a total eclipse of the heart, or whatever. And for an action movie to star a woman and not be marketed with shots of her zipping up a latex body suit or going incognito in a strip club is a relief. I give this one a faint feminist thumbs up.”
  • “amazing progressiveness symbolized by the fact that Angelina Jolie ended up playing an action hero originally written for a male star like Tom Cruise”
  • To put it in plainer terms, the filmmakers believe that  it was perfectly OK for the spouse to be rescued from mortal danger if said love-interest was a girl, but not if the romantic partner was a man.  So it’s great if the action hero is a girl, as long as they don’t have to opportunity to one-up any male counterparts and/or reverse the oldest cliche in the action-film handbook.  Saying that girls can be portrayed as helpless damsels in distress but boys can’t/shouldn’t be is the very opposite of the sort of ‘progress’ that Noyce and Jolie claim to be making.”
  • “Finally, Hollywood does what it should have been doing all along: casting women in leading roles written for men.”
  • “Additionally, all movies have faults, and most also portray women as sex objects, so Salt’s suspension of reality and dismissal of Iran as a legitimate military threat (the faults I noticed) barely register.                                                                                                                                                           This movie is not only worth seeing, it is worth paying for even if you’re seeing something else, since it tries to combat the Hollywood conventional wisdom that women are useful only insofar as they are hot. (Challenging Hollywood’s depictions of women seems to be one of Jolie’s life missions and why, as Vanity Fair reports, she refused to play a Bond girl but offered to play Bond).

LINKS (BIBLIOGRAPHY)

http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/2010/04/22/angelina_jolie_salt_open2010

http://equalwrites.org/2010/08/11/3163/

http://open.salon.com/blog/scott_mendelson/2010/04/21/angelina_jolies_salt_and_the_action_movie_double-standard

http://genfem.com/post/1002244808/salt

Category:  Uncategorized     

YEAR 13 Coursework Research

I’m interested in feminism and the representation of women in action movies such as Lara Croft and the question of  ”Are women portrayed as role models of independent strong women that can look after themselves. Or, ‘sexy chicks with guns’ to satisfy every man’s fantasy?’

Examples of movies:

SALT (2010)-Angelina Jolie being a CIA agent who is suspected for being a Russian Spy
Wanted (2009)- Angelina Jolie
Resident Evil-Afterlife (2010) Milla Jovovich
Machete (2010)- Jessica Alba
Older examples are: Lara Croft, Kill Bill 1 & 2, Underworld, Resident Evil (all of the series)

angelina-jolie-gun

jessica_alba_machete_high_quality

milla-jovovich-resident-evil-up1214

THE OLDER EXAMPLES:::::

kill_bill_i

angelinajolie2

underworld2-poster2

Laura Mulvey-Feminist theory :)

  • Male Gaze- How women are portrayed in the media?
  • voyeurism
  • sexual objectification
  • fetishism

Category:  Uncategorized